Honda NR750 v. 1.0

[doubledragoncc]

So after 5 fricking attempts to upload a little shit of a video and YT screwing it up here is a video to show the NR after I swapped the tyre width to the correct order. Before the wider tyre 80 was on the front and 60 on the rear and now it is the right way round from my normal thinking.

There is still some wobble, but more realistic and it feels right too. Remember the last video coming out of turn 6!!!

https://www.youtube.com/v/DcpX_kw2tFw

The rear tyre still floats so it needs sorting, but the width is now the right order for thin front fat back.

DD

[Blackheart]

For the rear tyre have u tried to change the radius?

The orginal model has front: 130/70 ZR 16; rear 180/55 ZR 17

[doubledragoncc]

I left the radius to start with as I wanted to do one thing at a time. I am going to try the radius now.

I need to get started on the MotoGP review so will leave the nitty gritty work to you lol.

DD

[h106frp]

See previous, 60 and 80 are not the width, they are the arc so you have given the rear a much bigger treaded area and the front less.

i.e. the front tyre is normally more 'round' and you can get further onto the sidewall

[Blackheart]

Yep these data are of Muramasa can not be wrong 

The issue is the radius, my tires have different size from mura. The weight is in kg or?

[Allen]

The width parameter doesn't really define the width, it defines how flat the profile of the tyre is, so in fact the more round profile is more likely on the front.

Let's put it this way, to do an Avon Speedmaster rear tyre, you would need width to be about 5 and TorusRadius to be around 0.254 (or in other words the same as the wheel + tyre radius), on the other hand a bicycle racing tyre would have a width of 90, but the TorusRadius would be about 0.01

[doubledragoncc]

@H So from what your saying, the 80 is a tighter, smaller and quicker shape and 60 larger? IRL the front tyre being smaller in width makes it faster in its roll action compared to a wider tyre, so I though the higher number was for a larger and slower roll action? It worked though 

DD

[doubledragoncc]

Now I am confused!!! LOL

DD

[Allen]

Minor observation... that sounds like an inline 4, not a 360 degree crank V4

90, 270, 90, 270 firing order shouldn't sound like that... try lifting some sound off a VFR400, or RC30

(VFR400 NC30, not the previous model (NC21/24) as they had different firing orders due to 180 degree crank as opposed to 360.. this is the same as the difference between the VFR750 and the RC30).

[doubledragoncc]

Allen.............Allen.................Allen.........................

Is that the Allen?

Yes wrong sound but I love it hehe

DD

[Blackheart]

Probably I leave the mod to version 0.4. When people come to criticize everything is time to stop ^^

[h106frp]

@H So from what your saying, the 80 is a tighter, smaller and quicker shape and 60 larger? IRL the front tyre being smaller in width makes it faster in its roll action compared to a wider tyre, so I though the higher number was for a larger and slower roll action? It worked though 

DD

Yes, that's correct. You are slowing the turning of the front tire by flattening its profile and this is probably balancing an issue with front trail being quite aggressive.

Possibly creating the 16inch wheel and tire is the solution

[doubledragoncc]

Thanks H.

DD

[Blackheart]

For jerez it's my fault that the bike doesn't touch the ground all along,  thsts not a bug but a compromise i did.
To build a track there's a visual part and a physic part,  so because i want to publy a new one(don't know when),  i decided to publy this one. The ground you see is not as ridable as the one you ride on,  i know it's not a good job but we can have pleasure until final version.

All tests for my bikes must be made on Victoria now. thx

[doubledragoncc]

I hate Victoria and I mean hate it!!!

DD