Messages

* KRP: more work to improve plugins support

* KRP: some user interface small changes

* GPB / WRS / KRP / WRS: fixed a crash with more than 100 paints


http://www.youtube.com/v/1jUvhJ_Tgzw

Thank you for the report.
Bug fixed.

OK, so the vertical axis is ratio?

I am having some success with the classic suspension  Still cannot work with the more advanced models though as trying to adjust the mounting points is very unpredictable.

I am a bit confused by front suspension trail;

The Mura only has 16mm, the MOD ducati has 32mm - these seem very small

For my MOD bike the book figure is around 95mm and seems quite typical from what i can find even for a racebike, if i try 95mm the bike is un-rideable and the steering totally unstable, reducing trail  makes things more stable. This seems a bit odd (reversed), although everything in BikeED looks sensible graphically.

Than you for the explanations so far, i am slowly starting to understand bikeED 

For the correct trail reading, please make sure that the front tyre radius is set in "Test".

The horizontal axis is the rear wheel vertical movement, from 0 to max travel ( 112mm ).
Modern GP bikes have a very "flat" curve.
A ratio of 2 means that the shock compresses 1mm for every 2mm of wheel travel.

It shows the ratio between rear wheel travel and shock travel.

* KRP: work to improve the plugins interface


http://www.youtube.com/v/ThWQda_Gzxs

BTW, in comparison to other games, GP Bikes uses very high bandwidth and the replay size (and the lags when viewing other players) makes me wonder what data is actually being transmitted.
Would you care to elaborate on that?

Interesting!
What games are you comparing GPB to?
On the client or on the server side? Or both?
Could you please provide some numbers?
With or without the dynamic track surface?

piboso why not help us?

Because time is scarce resource
There is a "Dash" section in the documentation waiting to be filled: http://docs.piboso.com/wiki/index.php/Main_Page

* KRP: fixed some user interface bugs

* MXB: allowed setting rear brake and clutch on the same input


http://www.youtube.com/v/WKEWviZKDyg

* KRP: more optimizations of the "Kart Choose" page


http://www.youtube.com/v/pM8_HuQ0b34

Are you able to simulate High and Low Speed Compression Damping on the rear suspension in GPB,MXB?
Is it possible to add this feature?
Right now we are "only" able to adjust the rear compression damping in general.
I´m asking because most of the rear dampers used in Sport Bikes / GP / SBK / MX  have the possibility to adjust seperate High and Low Speed compression damping on the rear damper.

Regards
C.

As you can see in the CFG files, there already are separate high and low speed damping.
So this is probably more of a "suggestion and wishlist" request, to add the garage setting.

* KRP: more work on the tyre simulation

* KRP: updated all the karts to the latest tyre data format

* KRP: fixed a bug in the weight readout in the garage

* KRP: fixed some bugs in the new race manager code


http://www.youtube.com/v/moiUyFQQE-0

This has already been implemented in Beta9.

* KRP: debugging of heats support

* KRP: work to improve the tyre simulation


http://www.youtube.com/v/BQRcUxNJEbs

It is physically correct to have more lean in banked turns.

Obviously but not to the degree it's happening at the moment with Manu's bikes. They reach around 61° on a completely flat track so if you think they lean too much in the banked corners, GPB physics is off.

It looked much higher than 61 in some shots, but probably it was the banking.
It very likely the physics rider is moving to the sides too much, and maybe the detection point is not correct, either.
Hopefully this issue will be solved for Beta9.