Messages

hi,
in the Ducati SBK mod to a diameter front brake 305, normally there is 320.thank.

Depends on the team, for example, Steve Martin DFX used a diameter "Front 290/305 mm, post. 200mm - Tyres ant. 120 / 75x16,5" post. 190 / 65x16,5 ".

305 mm was the standard measure also for the official team 

No, Brembo 305 mm ventilated coupled with radial calipers with four pistons, is correct.

Initially there was a lot of lag at the start and I left the gas. After there was a good  laps with Tonygas and Kerazo (i'm sorry for Ale mistake.. :/) ... with Kerazo we 'battled' with no mistakes and a lot of pressure until the last lap. It was nice
I saw many correct  behaviour on track, so Congratulations to all.

During the Christmas break we will update the Mod, to be able to run well at Monza and next tracks.

[but you can always get positive things of opinions .]

ODI

response of noobs (me), before criticizing people, learning to use the physical tire, tires SC1 and SC2 Supercorsa, short-term endurance of four hours in the simulation, 10 minutes.....

 
Aaaaah... maybe I understand:
Yes, probabilly that's why we do race of 13 laps. 

It is normal to opine of bikesets , just as is done with the GPB , because everything is not perfect and there are mistakes, but you can always get positive things of opinions .

Not really, not here. If I need opinions, i know who to ask.
I dont ask money for this,  so i don't have to account to anyone.
And if a mod is not shared on a forum, people should learn to respect the will of the author.

   

That comment is ... humm ... bad. Actually, knowing it was addressed to Warlock, it's worse than bad.

MaX.

Not so bad if you read the previous comments. however, I will not discuss this with you.

Also, moto2 bikeset took many work from other people who knows what he is doing, and you are comparing it with motogp14.
Seems i can't question your work (what i'm not doing), but you can question others work, not very fair.....


Anyway,... peace, it's just my opinion.

Depends on how works are questioned. Here the only ones who analyze every single paragraph of my works is people on this forum. I have never spoken on the work of others (because everyone is free to work as he wants according to his style and his taste) , but if someone compares so barbaric and without going deep, my work with others, decreeing that others are better, I get angry a little ', is normal.


peace.

Sorry but for me it is very offensive what I read. Because you can not throw in the trash an entire bikeset of 9 bikes having experienced only one, and say "I prefer the moto2". It is not correct to me that I always try to adapte credible data to gpbikes physics.

[the only stk i have tried]

I do also think the Kawa (the only stk i have tried)

Wow. What funny comments in this forum.
Moto2 is like driving motogp14 in my opinion, No difference, but tastes are tastes. The choice is yours
I'm not interested in making mods for noobs who do not know how to set up a motorcycle. Bikes that moves "like hell"? increases the rebound, this is what do a person who understand  motorcycles.

well ... false start without moving, fantastic... ...

fortunately Aragon... is gone!

see you in next race.

Hi hawk!

unfortunately does not always... I noticed that even in 'almost' perfect tracks there are core.exe,  especially when the number of participants increases ...
personally  when I was with my old internet provider i had less core.exe, since I changed with new provider my line is faster .. but I get more core.exe
is a real mystery ...

I love too Aragon and I would run there ... we will see with Ale ...

no problem  .. gp bikes is a simulation and what we are doing is only put real data ... the differences are given only by this, and how every bikes reacts to the gpbikes physics...

however, sorry for this but there is a new update (and we explain why)


http://gp-bikes-italia.forumfree.it/?t=69789678

[no]

hey guys,

i noticed that there are big differences between the bikes: e.g.:
rsv4 and 1199 feel like they are the same bikes with different, very powerfull engines. the duc must have something around 220hp in comparison with the bmw.
the rsv4 is nearly the same strong as the bmw.
the zx10 feels like you ride on rails, very very stable. bmw is wipping, wobbeling around all the time, in every situation and highsides your rider in the end.
at last the r1 is for me a very smooth and also a good, rideable bike. the only bike where i can "feel" the powerdifferences like in "real" when i compare it with the bmw is the r1.

i just wanted to tell my opinion, maybe that could be a reason that the CC will not be that "fair" as it looks like. but its only the 0.93 beta version of this bikeset, maybe in the future the bikes get closer to each other.

just to get not missunderstood: i wanted to keep my bmw. the upper "things" are no reason for me to change the bike, just because i think that i maybe could be a little faster with antoher bike at the moment, in this version of the bikeset.

Emmm... no! rsv4 and 1199 are completely different bike with different geometries with real actual measures (you can check by yourself), like all other bikes. The Panigale has 204 hp, the BMW superstock has around 210-215 hp. But the difference is torque, panigale has 135 NM. Like no other bike.

p.s. our testers run more or less on the same laptime with all bikes. You just have to adapt to each bike, of course.

PS: Yes we are talking abuot standard stock bikes in this thread.... Well I presumed we were. LOL 

hihihi hard follow your words for me ... sorry m8 

Piboso said the core programme physics algorithms are now state of the art(I take as meaning they are correct and finished). If this is so then surely the bike physics file can only be set to correct settings to get the bikes handling correctly and therefore a bike being able to go faster? Surely then anything set incorrect should show-up like a saw thumb in slower and more erratic performances as we are seeing now in the stock bike because their physics files are not set-up properly for the core-physics of GPB.

Hawk.

files are set correctly, stock = slower bike 

edit. oh you mean standard bike of gpb, ok

Just downloaded the latest WSS Bike set Beta 6c and I'm still getting a data mismatch on the GPBItalia WSS600 Aragon 0.85_NDS server. There must be something on that server that I haven't got? 

Anyone else getting this or am I alone with this?

Hawk.

oh... wait.. you right , our server is not updated yet... 

The other MOD bikes are all based off the default bikes of there class. The Italian bikes are the only ones that have there own physics per bike.

I've just been testing the R6 on beta 6c and it's just like it was before... a brilliant little bike indeed! Well done you guys!!
Can't wait for tomorrows Bike MOD update, then I can go online.

I already tried going online with the GPB italia WSS600 server but I'm getting a data mismatch, so don't know if they have updated the wss bike set from what is on their WSS Bikeset download link? But I couldn't get in. 

Hawk.

Uhmmm... maybe you need to download the new version for beta6c?

sorry for the absence but I am very busy on the italian forum...

all the updates you can always track them on our fbpage anyway