suzuki gsx-r

[franco pizzagalli]

you have to change the entire file, I tested and I see the cockpit to the first person.
(download on the pc of my wife, do an external manipulation).
Can you show me a picture of what's wrong ?, I put my photo of the first person.

[franco pizzagalli]

thank you, this time I realized, wow, I correct the fault.
A +

[doubledragoncc]

Way to go Franco great job you got the bars and tank, was having trouble finding a place for gas and me hands lol.

Thanks buddy

DD

[franco pizzagalli]

you must take the files chassis_c.edf and gfx.cfg.
Than replace it in the database file.
Never having done all the options, I did not know he had it all.
Thank you for your understanding.
The files are in the highest link in the topic.
A +

https://www.dropbox.com/sh/mi4z6tb4ytm4vxk/AABh_ZXAJvQXKazZ8PKmUw4Fa?dl=0

[franco pizzagalli]

it was laborious, but is it all right now?
A+

[doubledragoncc]

Very much appreciated man

DD

[Hawk]

Very nice job indeed Franco! Especially for your first bike Mod! Amazing! 

Hawk.

[BOBR6 84]

Nice bike!! 

Super stable... How is that with 990 physics??

[franco pizzagalli]

I do not know, but I is (sure ) base of physic marusama  990, but the geometry is a little different, because the dimensions of the Suzuki is not exactly the same.
Physics dgpbikes still a big fog for me, but I work to understand.
A+

[HornetMaX]

I do not know, but I is (sure ) base of physic marusama  990, but the geometry is a little different, because the dimensions of the Suzuki is not exactly the same.
Physics dgpbikes still a big fog for me, but I work to understand.
A+

Hi Franco,

comparing the geom of the murasama to your one, there are some differences that make me think you've used the .geom of the murasama from an old GPB beta.

Also, changing the .geom you've actually changed the physics.

MaX.

[franco pizzagalli]

Hi Max,
you are right, the base was beta 5, because my beta 6 crashed often.

I thought that the difference between beta6 and beta5 for file.geom was only the position of the driver.

Do you think we should take the Murasama beta 6 for physics motorcycles for beta6 ?

Now i have find a new driver fo my graphic card and beta6 crash less, but he crash more beta 5 ( beta 5 crash never )

A+

[doubledragoncc]

Could this be an answer to why GPB bikes in 6 are having problems? If the basics of the beta5 are better Piboso should be told so he can figure out why. i may be a big help for the physics issues as this bike is great to ride.

Great work again to you Franco, love it

DD

[HornetMaX]

I thought that the difference between beta6 and beta5 for file.geom was only the position of the driver.

I think there's at least one new parameter in the .geom (pressure_center2) and maybe some params that were a zero before and are not zero in beta6 (maybe meaning that they were not used before and are used now).

But notice also that your .cfg is form beta5 too, and there are many differences there between beta5 and beta6 (chassis flex, aero, suspensions).

That makes me think that it would be interesting to have the murasama .cfg and .geom of all GPB betas and track the differences.

Do you think we should take the Murasama beta 6 for physics motorcycles for beta6 ?

Well, it's totally up to you. I think that Noss too used the beta5 murasama physics as a base for his RCV and people do like how the bike handles, more than beta6's murasama.

I don't know which differences are causing that: I planned to do some testing but I'm less and less motivated to spend time on GPB trying to understand stuff, I'm moving more into a "just play" (and wait) approach.

Anyway, Noss has released a new version of his RCV in which some differences are now gone, I still have to try it.

MaX.

[HornetMaX]

1st person view works almost fine now.

Missing things: working dashboard and (maybe) some dark paint/texture paint on the inside of the fairing.

Good job Franco !

MaX.

[Klax75]

Can I put this in the next Bike MOD?